A-level Economics Tutor

June 2025: AS Paper 1

80 marks · 18 question parts · Paper, mark scheme and report on Pearson's site

Question by question

QTopicMarksAOType
1(a) Production possibility frontiers 1Multiple choice
1(b) The nature of economics and the economic problem 3AO1=1,AO2=1,AO3=1Short answer
2(a) Price, income and cross elasticities of demand 3AO1=1,AO2=2Calculation
2(b) Price, income and cross elasticities of demand 1Multiple choice
3(a) Free market, mixed and command economies 1AO1=1Definition
3(b) Market failure and externalities 1Multiple choice
3(c) Public goods and information gaps 2AO1=2Short answer
4(a) Supply, demand and price determination 1Multiple choice
4(b) Supply, demand and price determination 3AO1=1,AO2=1,AO3=1Short answer
5(a) Supply, demand and price determination 1Multiple choice
5(b) Supply, demand and price determination 3AO1=1,AO2=2Calculation
6(a) Price, income and cross elasticities of demand 5AO1=1,AO2=2,AO3=2Short answer
6(b) Rational decision making and behavioural economics 10AO1=2,AO2=2,AO3=2,AO4=4Extended response
6(c) Price elasticity of supply 6Short answer
6(d) The nature of economics and the economic problem 4AO1=2,AO2=2Short answer
6(e) Market failure and externalities 15AO1=3,AO2=3,AO3=3,AO4=6Extended response
6(f) Government intervention in markets, Indirect taxes and subsidies 20AO1=4,AO2=4,AO3=6,AO4=6Essay
6(g) Government intervention in markets, Indirect taxes and subsidies 20AO1=4,AO2=4,AO3=6,AO4=6Essay

The questions

1(a)1(b)2(a)2(b)3(a)3(b)3(c)4(a)4(b)5(a)5(b)6(a)6(b)6(c)6(d)6(e)6(f)6(g)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q1(a) 1 mark Multiple choice production possibility frontiers
(a) Spending on capital goods in the UK rose by 4.8% in Quarter 4, 2022. Which one of the following is an example of a capital good? (1) A A computer B Savings in the bank C Shares in a company D Underground reserves of oil
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q1(b) 3 marks AO1=1, AO2=1, AO3=1 Short answer nature of economics
(b) Using an example from your own knowledge, explain the distinction between renewable and non-renewable resources. (3)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q2(a) 3 marks AO1=1, AO2=2 Calculation price elasticity of demand
(a) In 2021, a bakery sold 2.5 million sausage rolls per week at the price of £1.00 each. In 2022 the price increased to £1.20. The price elasticity of demand was estimated to be -0.2. Calculate the new quantity of sausage rolls sold per week in 2022 after the price increased, ceteris paribus. (3)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q2(b) 1 mark Multiple choice price elasticity of demand
(b) Which one of the following is the most appropriate description of the price elasticity of demand of -0.2? (1) A Perfectly inelastic B Relatively elastic C Relatively inelastic D Unitary elastic
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q3(a) 1 mark AO1=1 Definition economic systems
(a) The economy of Singapore is a highly developed free market economy with some elements of government intervention. Define the term ‘free market’. (1)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q3(b) 1 mark Multiple choice externalities
(b) Which one of the following is the most likely reason why a free market fails to achieve the social optimum position? (1) A Public goods are provided free of charge to users B There is overproduction of goods with external benefits C There is underconsumption of goods with external benefits D There is underproduction of goods with external costs
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q3(c) 2 marks AO1=2 Short answer public goods and information gaps
(c) Explain why public goods may not be provided by the private sector. (2)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q4(a) 1 mark Multiple choice supply and demand
(a) During the period from October to December 2022, production of coffee beans in the Philippines increased by 2.7% from the same quarter in 2021. Which one of the following is most likely to cause a shift to the right of the supply curve? (1) A A decrease in the demand for coffee B A subsidy to coffee bean producers C A tax on coffee bean production D The cost of production rises
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q4(b) 3 marks AO1=1, AO2=1, AO3=1 Short answer supply and demand
(b) Explain how the operation of market forces will eliminate an excess supply of coffee. (3)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q5(a) 1 mark Multiple choice supply and demand
Data and extracts for question 55 In March 2019, 458 054 new car registrations were made, which subsequently fell by 44% in March 2020 due to the impact of the global health crisis. Demand for new vehicles can change quickly and can be caused by a variety of factors. (Source: adapted from https://fleetworld.co.uk/uk-new-car-registrations-slump-44-in-march/)
(a) Which one of the following factors may cause a shift in demand for new cars? (1) A Advertising B Cost of production C Indirect taxes D Subsidy to producers March new car registrations 2007 to 2023 600 000 500 000 400 000 400 000 287 825 300 000 200 000 100 000 0 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 ‘11 ‘12 ‘13 ‘14 ‘15 ‘16 ‘17 ‘18 ‘19 ‘20 ‘21 ‘22 ‘23 (Source: adapted from https://www.smmt.co.uk/vehicle-data/car-registrations/)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q5(b) 3 marks AO1=1, AO2=2 Calculation supply and demand
Data and extracts for question 55 In March 2019, 458 054 new car registrations were made, which subsequently fell by 44% in March 2020 due to the impact of the global health crisis. Demand for new vehicles can change quickly and can be caused by a variety of factors. (Source: adapted from https://fleetworld.co.uk/uk-new-car-registrations-slump-44-in-march/)
(b) The diagram on the previous page shows new car registrations in March from 2007 to 2023. Using 2010 as the base year, calculate the index number for 2023. (3)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q6(a) 5 marks AO1=1, AO2=2, AO3=2 Short answer price elasticity of demand
Data and extracts for question 6Sources for use with SECTION B Read the following figures (1 and 2) and extracts (A and B) before answering Question 6. The market for meat and the growth of vegetarianism Figure 1 The impact of subsidies on farmer income, in England, 2018–2019 (£000 per farm) Cereals Dairy Grazing livestock Pigs Poultry Mixed -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 £000 per farm Key Profit Subsidies (Source: adapted from www.FT.com) Figure 2 Potential impact of indirect tax rises on meat prices per kg, 2023–2030 Before indirect After indirect Type of Meat tax increases tax increases Beef/Veal £24.24 £29.50 Chicken £7.60 £8.63 (Source: adapted from Tax beef, pork and chicken to help climate and health, EU urged – CGTN) Extract A The case for cutting out meat Around a third of Britons are reducing the amount of meat they eat or are cutting it out altogether. Are these consumers right to be cutting out meat? For a start, there are the greenhouse gases released as a result of producing food. The evidence is clear that switching to a plant-based diet would lower emissions. A UK study found that eating a 5 diet high in meat costs 7.2 kg carbon dioxide emissions per day, compared with 3.8 kg for vegetarians. It would also free up land for other uses. Nearly 80% of the world’s farmland is dedicated to rearing animals; a plant-based diet would cut the use of land for agriculture by 76%. The land currently used by grazing livestock could be used for “rewilding”, allowing the environment and animal species destroyed by meat farming to 10 recover. Our health and wealth would be better too. A study published in 2016 modelled what would happen to our health and the global economy if we all switched to vegetarian diets. The economic benefits of switching to plant-based diets could be as much as £700 billion to £1 trillion per year in terms of savings on healthcare costs and lost 15 working days due to ill health. Some economists recommend an increased indirect tax on animal products so that their prices reflect the cost of externalities. This could impact on European farmers, if adopted by the European Union. The tax could bring £35 billion to the EU, with around £15 billion of that going directly to farmers. The 20 rest would be used to bring down VAT on fruit and vegetables, and fund other policies to encourage healthy-eating diets both in and outside the EU. (Source: adapted from https://moneyweek.com/499842/the-economic- consequences-of-veganism December-28-2018) Extract B Businesses benefitting from meat-substitute products There is one group for whom the trend towards meat-substitute products is definitely a good thing: processed food manufacturers and retailers. Finest British beef burgers are priced at £6.61 per kg. The ‘fake burger’ (which is made mostly of pea protein) is priced at £21.81 per kg even though the ingredients used to 5 make them, such as mushrooms, peas and palm oil, are cheaper ingredients than meat. Despite high prices, demand continues to rise for these products. This might benefit shareholders, but is it doing any real good for the rest of us? A large food producer bought meat-substitute product maker Vegetarian Butcher in December 2018 and is moving towards a range with more meat-substitute products. 10 In 2017, Nestlé bought Sweet Earth, a California-based maker of vegetarian foods, and it is launching its own meat-substitute ‘Incredible Burger’. It expects its meat-substitute revenues to reach $1 billion by 2029. As subsidies are being cut in every area of farming, consumers ought to be willing to pay higher prices for all food products. If farmers are to stay in business, they need to find 15 additional sources of revenue such as oyster mushrooms, goji berries and basil. (Source: adapted from http://www.financialtimes.com/the-veganism-boom-does- more-for-food-company-profits-than-the-planet February-22-2019)
(a) With reference to Extract B, explain why the change to meat-substitute products may result in an increase in the revenue of food companies. Refer to the concept of price elasticity of demand in your answer. (5)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q6(b) 10 marks AO1=2, AO2=2, AO3=2, AO4=4 10-mark response rational decision making and behavioural economics
Data and extracts for question 6Sources for use with SECTION B Read the following figures (1 and 2) and extracts (A and B) before answering Question 6. The market for meat and the growth of vegetarianism Figure 1 The impact of subsidies on farmer income, in England, 2018–2019 (£000 per farm) Cereals Dairy Grazing livestock Pigs Poultry Mixed -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 £000 per farm Key Profit Subsidies (Source: adapted from www.FT.com) Figure 2 Potential impact of indirect tax rises on meat prices per kg, 2023–2030 Before indirect After indirect Type of Meat tax increases tax increases Beef/Veal £24.24 £29.50 Chicken £7.60 £8.63 (Source: adapted from Tax beef, pork and chicken to help climate and health, EU urged – CGTN) Extract A The case for cutting out meat Around a third of Britons are reducing the amount of meat they eat or are cutting it out altogether. Are these consumers right to be cutting out meat? For a start, there are the greenhouse gases released as a result of producing food. The evidence is clear that switching to a plant-based diet would lower emissions. A UK study found that eating a 5 diet high in meat costs 7.2 kg carbon dioxide emissions per day, compared with 3.8 kg for vegetarians. It would also free up land for other uses. Nearly 80% of the world’s farmland is dedicated to rearing animals; a plant-based diet would cut the use of land for agriculture by 76%. The land currently used by grazing livestock could be used for “rewilding”, allowing the environment and animal species destroyed by meat farming to 10 recover. Our health and wealth would be better too. A study published in 2016 modelled what would happen to our health and the global economy if we all switched to vegetarian diets. The economic benefits of switching to plant-based diets could be as much as £700 billion to £1 trillion per year in terms of savings on healthcare costs and lost 15 working days due to ill health. Some economists recommend an increased indirect tax on animal products so that their prices reflect the cost of externalities. This could impact on European farmers, if adopted by the European Union. The tax could bring £35 billion to the EU, with around £15 billion of that going directly to farmers. The 20 rest would be used to bring down VAT on fruit and vegetables, and fund other policies to encourage healthy-eating diets both in and outside the EU. (Source: adapted from https://moneyweek.com/499842/the-economic- consequences-of-veganism December-28-2018) Extract B Businesses benefitting from meat-substitute products There is one group for whom the trend towards meat-substitute products is definitely a good thing: processed food manufacturers and retailers. Finest British beef burgers are priced at £6.61 per kg. The ‘fake burger’ (which is made mostly of pea protein) is priced at £21.81 per kg even though the ingredients used to 5 make them, such as mushrooms, peas and palm oil, are cheaper ingredients than meat. Despite high prices, demand continues to rise for these products. This might benefit shareholders, but is it doing any real good for the rest of us? A large food producer bought meat-substitute product maker Vegetarian Butcher in December 2018 and is moving towards a range with more meat-substitute products. 10 In 2017, Nestlé bought Sweet Earth, a California-based maker of vegetarian foods, and it is launching its own meat-substitute ‘Incredible Burger’. It expects its meat-substitute revenues to reach $1 billion by 2029. As subsidies are being cut in every area of farming, consumers ought to be willing to pay higher prices for all food products. If farmers are to stay in business, they need to find 15 additional sources of revenue such as oyster mushrooms, goji berries and basil. (Source: adapted from http://www.financialtimes.com/the-veganism-boom-does- more-for-food-company-profits-than-the-planet February-22-2019)
(b) With reference to the information provided and your own knowledge, assess the view that consumers switching to meat-substitute products is an example of rational behaviour. (10)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q6(c) 6 marks Short answer Hard elasticity of supply
Data and extracts for question 6Sources for use with SECTION B Read the following figures (1 and 2) and extracts (A and B) before answering Question 6. The market for meat and the growth of vegetarianism Figure 1 The impact of subsidies on farmer income, in England, 2018–2019 (£000 per farm) Cereals Dairy Grazing livestock Pigs Poultry Mixed -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 £000 per farm Key Profit Subsidies (Source: adapted from www.FT.com) Figure 2 Potential impact of indirect tax rises on meat prices per kg, 2023–2030 Before indirect After indirect Type of Meat tax increases tax increases Beef/Veal £24.24 £29.50 Chicken £7.60 £8.63 (Source: adapted from Tax beef, pork and chicken to help climate and health, EU urged – CGTN) Extract A The case for cutting out meat Around a third of Britons are reducing the amount of meat they eat or are cutting it out altogether. Are these consumers right to be cutting out meat? For a start, there are the greenhouse gases released as a result of producing food. The evidence is clear that switching to a plant-based diet would lower emissions. A UK study found that eating a 5 diet high in meat costs 7.2 kg carbon dioxide emissions per day, compared with 3.8 kg for vegetarians. It would also free up land for other uses. Nearly 80% of the world’s farmland is dedicated to rearing animals; a plant-based diet would cut the use of land for agriculture by 76%. The land currently used by grazing livestock could be used for “rewilding”, allowing the environment and animal species destroyed by meat farming to 10 recover. Our health and wealth would be better too. A study published in 2016 modelled what would happen to our health and the global economy if we all switched to vegetarian diets. The economic benefits of switching to plant-based diets could be as much as £700 billion to £1 trillion per year in terms of savings on healthcare costs and lost 15 working days due to ill health. Some economists recommend an increased indirect tax on animal products so that their prices reflect the cost of externalities. This could impact on European farmers, if adopted by the European Union. The tax could bring £35 billion to the EU, with around £15 billion of that going directly to farmers. The 20 rest would be used to bring down VAT on fruit and vegetables, and fund other policies to encourage healthy-eating diets both in and outside the EU. (Source: adapted from https://moneyweek.com/499842/the-economic- consequences-of-veganism December-28-2018) Extract B Businesses benefitting from meat-substitute products There is one group for whom the trend towards meat-substitute products is definitely a good thing: processed food manufacturers and retailers. Finest British beef burgers are priced at £6.61 per kg. The ‘fake burger’ (which is made mostly of pea protein) is priced at £21.81 per kg even though the ingredients used to 5 make them, such as mushrooms, peas and palm oil, are cheaper ingredients than meat. Despite high prices, demand continues to rise for these products. This might benefit shareholders, but is it doing any real good for the rest of us? A large food producer bought meat-substitute product maker Vegetarian Butcher in December 2018 and is moving towards a range with more meat-substitute products. 10 In 2017, Nestlé bought Sweet Earth, a California-based maker of vegetarian foods, and it is launching its own meat-substitute ‘Incredible Burger’. It expects its meat-substitute revenues to reach $1 billion by 2029. As subsidies are being cut in every area of farming, consumers ought to be willing to pay higher prices for all food products. If farmers are to stay in business, they need to find 15 additional sources of revenue such as oyster mushrooms, goji berries and basil. (Source: adapted from http://www.financialtimes.com/the-veganism-boom-does- more-for-food-company-profits-than-the-planet February-22-2019)
(c) With reference to the last paragraph of Extract B, explain two factors which are likely to influence price elasticity of supply. (6)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q6(d) 4 marks AO1=2, AO2=2 Short answer nature of economics
Data and extracts for question 6Sources for use with SECTION B Read the following figures (1 and 2) and extracts (A and B) before answering Question 6. The market for meat and the growth of vegetarianism Figure 1 The impact of subsidies on farmer income, in England, 2018–2019 (£000 per farm) Cereals Dairy Grazing livestock Pigs Poultry Mixed -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 £000 per farm Key Profit Subsidies (Source: adapted from www.FT.com) Figure 2 Potential impact of indirect tax rises on meat prices per kg, 2023–2030 Before indirect After indirect Type of Meat tax increases tax increases Beef/Veal £24.24 £29.50 Chicken £7.60 £8.63 (Source: adapted from Tax beef, pork and chicken to help climate and health, EU urged – CGTN) Extract A The case for cutting out meat Around a third of Britons are reducing the amount of meat they eat or are cutting it out altogether. Are these consumers right to be cutting out meat? For a start, there are the greenhouse gases released as a result of producing food. The evidence is clear that switching to a plant-based diet would lower emissions. A UK study found that eating a 5 diet high in meat costs 7.2 kg carbon dioxide emissions per day, compared with 3.8 kg for vegetarians. It would also free up land for other uses. Nearly 80% of the world’s farmland is dedicated to rearing animals; a plant-based diet would cut the use of land for agriculture by 76%. The land currently used by grazing livestock could be used for “rewilding”, allowing the environment and animal species destroyed by meat farming to 10 recover. Our health and wealth would be better too. A study published in 2016 modelled what would happen to our health and the global economy if we all switched to vegetarian diets. The economic benefits of switching to plant-based diets could be as much as £700 billion to £1 trillion per year in terms of savings on healthcare costs and lost 15 working days due to ill health. Some economists recommend an increased indirect tax on animal products so that their prices reflect the cost of externalities. This could impact on European farmers, if adopted by the European Union. The tax could bring £35 billion to the EU, with around £15 billion of that going directly to farmers. The 20 rest would be used to bring down VAT on fruit and vegetables, and fund other policies to encourage healthy-eating diets both in and outside the EU. (Source: adapted from https://moneyweek.com/499842/the-economic- consequences-of-veganism December-28-2018) Extract B Businesses benefitting from meat-substitute products There is one group for whom the trend towards meat-substitute products is definitely a good thing: processed food manufacturers and retailers. Finest British beef burgers are priced at £6.61 per kg. The ‘fake burger’ (which is made mostly of pea protein) is priced at £21.81 per kg even though the ingredients used to 5 make them, such as mushrooms, peas and palm oil, are cheaper ingredients than meat. Despite high prices, demand continues to rise for these products. This might benefit shareholders, but is it doing any real good for the rest of us? A large food producer bought meat-substitute product maker Vegetarian Butcher in December 2018 and is moving towards a range with more meat-substitute products. 10 In 2017, Nestlé bought Sweet Earth, a California-based maker of vegetarian foods, and it is launching its own meat-substitute ‘Incredible Burger’. It expects its meat-substitute revenues to reach $1 billion by 2029. As subsidies are being cut in every area of farming, consumers ought to be willing to pay higher prices for all food products. If farmers are to stay in business, they need to find 15 additional sources of revenue such as oyster mushrooms, goji berries and basil. (Source: adapted from http://www.financialtimes.com/the-veganism-boom-does- more-for-food-company-profits-than-the-planet February-22-2019)
(d) Using examples from either Extract A or Extract B, explain what is meant by positive and normative economic statements. (4)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q6(e) 15 marks AO1=3, AO2=3, AO3=3, AO4=6 15-mark response externalities
Data and extracts for question 6Sources for use with SECTION B Read the following figures (1 and 2) and extracts (A and B) before answering Question 6. The market for meat and the growth of vegetarianism Figure 1 The impact of subsidies on farmer income, in England, 2018–2019 (£000 per farm) Cereals Dairy Grazing livestock Pigs Poultry Mixed -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 £000 per farm Key Profit Subsidies (Source: adapted from www.FT.com) Figure 2 Potential impact of indirect tax rises on meat prices per kg, 2023–2030 Before indirect After indirect Type of Meat tax increases tax increases Beef/Veal £24.24 £29.50 Chicken £7.60 £8.63 (Source: adapted from Tax beef, pork and chicken to help climate and health, EU urged – CGTN) Extract A The case for cutting out meat Around a third of Britons are reducing the amount of meat they eat or are cutting it out altogether. Are these consumers right to be cutting out meat? For a start, there are the greenhouse gases released as a result of producing food. The evidence is clear that switching to a plant-based diet would lower emissions. A UK study found that eating a 5 diet high in meat costs 7.2 kg carbon dioxide emissions per day, compared with 3.8 kg for vegetarians. It would also free up land for other uses. Nearly 80% of the world’s farmland is dedicated to rearing animals; a plant-based diet would cut the use of land for agriculture by 76%. The land currently used by grazing livestock could be used for “rewilding”, allowing the environment and animal species destroyed by meat farming to 10 recover. Our health and wealth would be better too. A study published in 2016 modelled what would happen to our health and the global economy if we all switched to vegetarian diets. The economic benefits of switching to plant-based diets could be as much as £700 billion to £1 trillion per year in terms of savings on healthcare costs and lost 15 working days due to ill health. Some economists recommend an increased indirect tax on animal products so that their prices reflect the cost of externalities. This could impact on European farmers, if adopted by the European Union. The tax could bring £35 billion to the EU, with around £15 billion of that going directly to farmers. The 20 rest would be used to bring down VAT on fruit and vegetables, and fund other policies to encourage healthy-eating diets both in and outside the EU. (Source: adapted from https://moneyweek.com/499842/the-economic- consequences-of-veganism December-28-2018) Extract B Businesses benefitting from meat-substitute products There is one group for whom the trend towards meat-substitute products is definitely a good thing: processed food manufacturers and retailers. Finest British beef burgers are priced at £6.61 per kg. The ‘fake burger’ (which is made mostly of pea protein) is priced at £21.81 per kg even though the ingredients used to 5 make them, such as mushrooms, peas and palm oil, are cheaper ingredients than meat. Despite high prices, demand continues to rise for these products. This might benefit shareholders, but is it doing any real good for the rest of us? A large food producer bought meat-substitute product maker Vegetarian Butcher in December 2018 and is moving towards a range with more meat-substitute products. 10 In 2017, Nestlé bought Sweet Earth, a California-based maker of vegetarian foods, and it is launching its own meat-substitute ‘Incredible Burger’. It expects its meat-substitute revenues to reach $1 billion by 2029. As subsidies are being cut in every area of farming, consumers ought to be willing to pay higher prices for all food products. If farmers are to stay in business, they need to find 15 additional sources of revenue such as oyster mushrooms, goji berries and basil. (Source: adapted from http://www.financialtimes.com/the-veganism-boom-does- more-for-food-company-profits-than-the-planet February-22-2019)
(e) With reference to Extract A, discuss the likely private costs and external costs caused by meat farming. Use an appropriate diagram in your answer. (15)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q6(f) 20 marks AO1=4, AO2=4, AO3=6, AO4=6 20-mark essay Either/or Hard government intervention in marketsindirect taxes and subsidies
Data and extracts for question 6Sources for use with SECTION B Read the following figures (1 and 2) and extracts (A and B) before answering Question 6. The market for meat and the growth of vegetarianism Figure 1 The impact of subsidies on farmer income, in England, 2018–2019 (£000 per farm) Cereals Dairy Grazing livestock Pigs Poultry Mixed -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 £000 per farm Key Profit Subsidies (Source: adapted from www.FT.com) Figure 2 Potential impact of indirect tax rises on meat prices per kg, 2023–2030 Before indirect After indirect Type of Meat tax increases tax increases Beef/Veal £24.24 £29.50 Chicken £7.60 £8.63 (Source: adapted from Tax beef, pork and chicken to help climate and health, EU urged – CGTN) Extract A The case for cutting out meat Around a third of Britons are reducing the amount of meat they eat or are cutting it out altogether. Are these consumers right to be cutting out meat? For a start, there are the greenhouse gases released as a result of producing food. The evidence is clear that switching to a plant-based diet would lower emissions. A UK study found that eating a 5 diet high in meat costs 7.2 kg carbon dioxide emissions per day, compared with 3.8 kg for vegetarians. It would also free up land for other uses. Nearly 80% of the world’s farmland is dedicated to rearing animals; a plant-based diet would cut the use of land for agriculture by 76%. The land currently used by grazing livestock could be used for “rewilding”, allowing the environment and animal species destroyed by meat farming to 10 recover. Our health and wealth would be better too. A study published in 2016 modelled what would happen to our health and the global economy if we all switched to vegetarian diets. The economic benefits of switching to plant-based diets could be as much as £700 billion to £1 trillion per year in terms of savings on healthcare costs and lost 15 working days due to ill health. Some economists recommend an increased indirect tax on animal products so that their prices reflect the cost of externalities. This could impact on European farmers, if adopted by the European Union. The tax could bring £35 billion to the EU, with around £15 billion of that going directly to farmers. The 20 rest would be used to bring down VAT on fruit and vegetables, and fund other policies to encourage healthy-eating diets both in and outside the EU. (Source: adapted from https://moneyweek.com/499842/the-economic- consequences-of-veganism December-28-2018) Extract B Businesses benefitting from meat-substitute products There is one group for whom the trend towards meat-substitute products is definitely a good thing: processed food manufacturers and retailers. Finest British beef burgers are priced at £6.61 per kg. The ‘fake burger’ (which is made mostly of pea protein) is priced at £21.81 per kg even though the ingredients used to 5 make them, such as mushrooms, peas and palm oil, are cheaper ingredients than meat. Despite high prices, demand continues to rise for these products. This might benefit shareholders, but is it doing any real good for the rest of us? A large food producer bought meat-substitute product maker Vegetarian Butcher in December 2018 and is moving towards a range with more meat-substitute products. 10 In 2017, Nestlé bought Sweet Earth, a California-based maker of vegetarian foods, and it is launching its own meat-substitute ‘Incredible Burger’. It expects its meat-substitute revenues to reach $1 billion by 2029. As subsidies are being cut in every area of farming, consumers ought to be willing to pay higher prices for all food products. If farmers are to stay in business, they need to find 15 additional sources of revenue such as oyster mushrooms, goji berries and basil. (Source: adapted from http://www.financialtimes.com/the-veganism-boom-does- more-for-food-company-profits-than-the-planet February-22-2019)
(f) Evaluate the likely microeconomic effects of a reduction in subsidies to farmers of animal products (Figure 1 and Extract B, line 14). Use a relevant diagram to support your answer. (20)
June 2025 · AS Paper 1 · Q6(g) 20 marks AO1=4, AO2=4, AO3=6, AO4=6 20-mark essay Either/or government intervention in marketsindirect taxes and subsidies
Data and extracts for question 6Sources for use with SECTION B Read the following figures (1 and 2) and extracts (A and B) before answering Question 6. The market for meat and the growth of vegetarianism Figure 1 The impact of subsidies on farmer income, in England, 2018–2019 (£000 per farm) Cereals Dairy Grazing livestock Pigs Poultry Mixed -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 £000 per farm Key Profit Subsidies (Source: adapted from www.FT.com) Figure 2 Potential impact of indirect tax rises on meat prices per kg, 2023–2030 Before indirect After indirect Type of Meat tax increases tax increases Beef/Veal £24.24 £29.50 Chicken £7.60 £8.63 (Source: adapted from Tax beef, pork and chicken to help climate and health, EU urged – CGTN) Extract A The case for cutting out meat Around a third of Britons are reducing the amount of meat they eat or are cutting it out altogether. Are these consumers right to be cutting out meat? For a start, there are the greenhouse gases released as a result of producing food. The evidence is clear that switching to a plant-based diet would lower emissions. A UK study found that eating a 5 diet high in meat costs 7.2 kg carbon dioxide emissions per day, compared with 3.8 kg for vegetarians. It would also free up land for other uses. Nearly 80% of the world’s farmland is dedicated to rearing animals; a plant-based diet would cut the use of land for agriculture by 76%. The land currently used by grazing livestock could be used for “rewilding”, allowing the environment and animal species destroyed by meat farming to 10 recover. Our health and wealth would be better too. A study published in 2016 modelled what would happen to our health and the global economy if we all switched to vegetarian diets. The economic benefits of switching to plant-based diets could be as much as £700 billion to £1 trillion per year in terms of savings on healthcare costs and lost 15 working days due to ill health. Some economists recommend an increased indirect tax on animal products so that their prices reflect the cost of externalities. This could impact on European farmers, if adopted by the European Union. The tax could bring £35 billion to the EU, with around £15 billion of that going directly to farmers. The 20 rest would be used to bring down VAT on fruit and vegetables, and fund other policies to encourage healthy-eating diets both in and outside the EU. (Source: adapted from https://moneyweek.com/499842/the-economic- consequences-of-veganism December-28-2018) Extract B Businesses benefitting from meat-substitute products There is one group for whom the trend towards meat-substitute products is definitely a good thing: processed food manufacturers and retailers. Finest British beef burgers are priced at £6.61 per kg. The ‘fake burger’ (which is made mostly of pea protein) is priced at £21.81 per kg even though the ingredients used to 5 make them, such as mushrooms, peas and palm oil, are cheaper ingredients than meat. Despite high prices, demand continues to rise for these products. This might benefit shareholders, but is it doing any real good for the rest of us? A large food producer bought meat-substitute product maker Vegetarian Butcher in December 2018 and is moving towards a range with more meat-substitute products. 10 In 2017, Nestlé bought Sweet Earth, a California-based maker of vegetarian foods, and it is launching its own meat-substitute ‘Incredible Burger’. It expects its meat-substitute revenues to reach $1 billion by 2029. As subsidies are being cut in every area of farming, consumers ought to be willing to pay higher prices for all food products. If farmers are to stay in business, they need to find 15 additional sources of revenue such as oyster mushrooms, goji berries and basil. (Source: adapted from http://www.financialtimes.com/the-veganism-boom-does- more-for-food-company-profits-than-the-planet February-22-2019)
(g) Evaluate the likely microeconomic effects of an increase in indirect tax on animal products (Figure 2 and Extract A, line 17). Use a relevant diagram to support your answer. (20)

Work with an Edexcel economics tutor

Want a paper marked and gone through with you? Message us.

Message us on WhatsApp About Lianne
Prefer email? Send an enquiry

If you are under 18, please include a parent's contact details. Enquiries go to enquiries@economicsaleveltutor.com and are deleted once handled. All tutoring is online.