Data and extracts for question 1

Answer
C
Mark scheme
_MS.webp)
Notes from the mark scheme and report
- a private good is rivalrous and excludable (C)
- non-rival and non-excludable is a public good (B)
- A and D are quasi-public goods
80 marks · 18 question parts · Paper, mark scheme and report on Pearson's site
C
Candidates typically performed well on this question, with most able to explain why flood defences are provided by the public sector. Many candidates were able to put explanations in the context of the Calder Valley, which was necessary to gain the application mark.
The majority of candidates were able to accurately define a minimum price, though some did inevitably confuse it with a maximum price.
B
Quantitative skills: QS 4 (construct and interpret a range of standard graphical forms)
Though many candidates were able to achieve both marks available here, lack of development was an obvious issue for many. Typically, we were looking for some notion of excess supply and the resulting storage costs for the EU.
B
This question was a challenge for some. Many candidates were able to explain a function of money in relation to Bitcoin, but a minority were able to score full marks. Candidates typically confused the different functions of money.
Many candidates were able to explain the difference between positive and normative statements, but many ignored the context of vaccination, which meant they missed the application mark.
C
Many candidates were again able to identify that flour production was price inelastic in supply, but a only minority were able to then move on to effectively explain why flour is difficult to produce quickly in the short run because it is derived from wheat which takes time to grow.
D
Quantitative skills: QS 2 (calculate, use and understand percentages, percentage changes and percentage point changes); QS 8 (make calculations of elasticity and interpret the result)
This question required candidates to consider the impact of the new Total Allowable Catches (TACs) on the market for fish. Most candidates were able to clearly draw a supply and demand diagram and used the extract fully to support their answers. Almost half of the candidates scored full marks on this question.
Quantitative skills: QS 4 (construct and interpret a range of standard graphical forms)
This was the first of the levels-based questions, and candidates performed well, with a majority scoring high marks. Candidates understood how it is rational for fishing companies to maximise profit whilst the impact on society was problematic because of the ‘tragedy of the commons’ explored in the extract. Better candidates were able to clearly identify how maximising profits causes failure in the market for fish and went on to give clear examples using the extract.
Extract B contained plenty of information candidates could use to consider the characteristics of private ownership and once the key concepts of excludability and rivalry were applied to the situation the majority of responses were able to score marks. Better candidates could explain two characteristics using the extract effectively.
This question was a four-mark calculation based on the concept of cross elasticity of demand. A majority of candidates were able to complete this successfully, which is a pleasing indicator of the improving numeracy of the cohort each year.
Quantitative skills: QS 2 (calculate, use and understand percentages, percentage changes and percentage point changes); QS 8 (make calculations of elasticity and interpret the result)
This fifteen-mark question was a strong test of a candidate’s ability to link textbook knowledge of an economy specialising in a particular industry, usually discussed in the context of production possibility frontiers, with the reality of the Scottish fishing industry. Most candidates could effectively draw a PPF to support their analysis. Better candidates tended to develop their analysis using examples from the extract, developing the advantages of specialisation such as higher productivity. The best candidates were then able to evaluate effectively and considered the problems of over-specialisation for the workers themselves or the Scottish economy, particularly with the moves to reduce TACs discussed in 6(a). Top candidates considered the extent to which the factors considered impacted on the market, and the time scale over which the forces considered were likely to play out in practice.
Quantitative skills: QS 4 (construct and interpret a range of standard graphical forms)
The first of the essay questions, this question was the least popular by a significant margin. Candidates also performed substantially worse on this response than they did on 6(g). The question allows candidates to demonstrate their understanding of a range of possible external costs arising from fishing. Extract B talks about the depletion of fishing stocks and candidates were expected to use a negative externality diagram to anchor their analysis. Strong candidates made a good attempt to substantiate points diagrammatically and in context. Many recognised the dangers of overfishing, such as a higher supply of fish leading to lower prices compared to other foodstuffs, the damage to marine life cause by nets, and the risk of pollution from fishing boats. There was usually a clear recognition that some costs will be more significant than others and this could involve clear evaluation using concepts developed during the teaching of the course, such as putting a precise value on the external costs, the difficulties of establishing how quickly the impacts can develop, and the possibilities of more environmentally friendly methods of fishing. Top level KAA marks required at least two likely costs and the better responses would draw an accurate negative externalities diagram. Evaluation marks could be achieved equally well by considering the many benefits from the fishing industry such as the 24 000 jobs in Scotland, and the quality of fish as a food compared to red meat.
Quantitative skills: QS 4 (construct and interpret a range of standard graphical forms)
This was a highly accessible question considering the methods that could be used to reduce overfishing. There are numerous possibilities that candidates could explore, and the vast majority talked about indirect taxes, a minimum price for fish, regulation or provision of information. This essay requires a clear exercise of critical analysis and good candidates would be expected to have a developed a clear appreciation of the method of government intervention to correct the market failure of overfishing. Sophisticated responses recognised that some forms of government intervention would be more effective than others. Good use of diagrams was seen throughout the candidates’ responses, usually an indirect tax diagram or minimum price diagram. To access evaluation marks candidates could explore the various strengths and weaknesses of each method proposed and use the prompts in the extracts to consider how effective the policy might be. Another line of development considered how some combination of policies might be necessary to effectively tackle the problem of overfishing. There was also a recognition that the UK’s new position outside the EU may lead to overfishing or conflict overfishing stocks, something which has been borne out of practice. The best responses would work by proposing realistic solutions to the problem of excess demand and then evaluating the most effective in the context of the real- world situation.
Quantitative skills: QS 4 (construct and interpret a range of standard graphical forms)
Want a paper marked and gone through with you? Message us.
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)

_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)

_MS.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)

_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)

_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)

_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)