Data and extracts for question 1

Mark scheme
_MS.webp)
Examiner's comment
Candidates performed well with this question, with a mean mark of over 3 out of 5. Most candidates could interpret the data easily, recognise a depreciation, and give good responses in a wide array of arguments. Many used a diagram to show a shift in supply or demand for the peso and consequently a fall in the value of the peso, and although a diagram was not necessary it did help candidates to think carefully about whether demand or supply was increasing or decreasing. Many answers were centred around the fall in copper prices as illustrated in Figure 1, and the fact that Figure 2 was vertically aligned did make it very clear that there was a strong positive correlation between copper prices and the value of the peso. This was strongly backed up by the text (‘weak currency’ Extract A line 10, 'copper accounts for 50% of its exports' line 2). A surprising number of candidates referred to a devaluation rather than depreciation, despite mentions of the ‘free trade model, which is unrestricted by government interventionism’ (lines 17-18) and the independent central bank (line 22). A tiny minority thought that the value of the peso was rising, but this was rare. This is a sign that most other candidates were largely well rehearsed in using exchange rate data such as this. The most significant difference between high and very high mark answers was the ability to make a chain of reasoning or ‘analysis’ between the factor that changed, for example copper prices, and the demand or supply for the currency. There were many candidates that could observe copper prices had fallen but then did not make the link that the revenue of exports would therefore fall, for example by showing that the demand for exports does not increase in proportion to the price fall. Many candidates mis-stated that the demand for exports had fallen, when in fact it was the increase in demand that was slowing (in China) or worldwide oversupply, but not a fall in demand. This counter-observation was a common weakness in responses, and illustrates the importance of using the data very closely. This is typical of a 4 out of 5 mark answer. This answer uses a well-labelled diagram. There are two marks for the data (the reading of values and the trend) and 2 knowledge marks (X had fallen and the demand for the peso had fallen). However, there is no reason given for the fall in value of exports. Sample 2: K Reduced X K Less demand for currency AP ER dropped AP Data reference AN - 4/5: needs more development Using the data is worth up to 2 marks on the 5 mark questions, although there are other ways to gain application marks. Many candidates had flawed analysis, for example in saying that slowing growth in China meant demand for copper fell, as in this example. K Reduced interest rates K Less saving by foreigners AP ER dropped AP Data reference AN Diagram 5/5 Using a diagram can save a good deal of writing, if relevant. K Reduced demand for X K Due to China AP ER dropped AP Data reference AN - 4/5: error on China slowdown Falling growth means levels are rising more slowly.
_ER.webp)
Notes from the mark scheme and report
- it is a depreciation (floating peso), not a devaluation
- link the fall in copper prices (Fig 1) to lower export earnings and lower demand for pesos
- quote the fall e.g. 0.20 to 0.14 (about 30%)
- only 1 mark in total for a diagram
Quantitative skills: QS 9 (interpret, apply and analyse information in written, graphical tabular and numerical forms)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)

_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)
_MS.webp)
_ER.webp)